Poetry on Screen

This week Leonieke Rammelt and I presented www.poetryfeeder.com at the 41st International Poetry Festival in Rotterdam. During the presentation the audience and participants were asked what is Poetry on Screen? Is the screen a surface? A carrier? Is it sound? Or is it digital interaction? I would describe the screen as a broadcast and gateway to an interface of the digital realm where I like to engage: Where internet is a network and content the foundation. This is where, like it or not, many of us are engaged in a continuous dialogue. It was 1994 when Douglas Davis showed the world its first online Collaborative Sentence. Davis, an Artist and pioneer demonstrated early on how potent the Hyperlinked pages, also know as internet would be in connecting, engaging and inviting its audience to participate.

That the foundation of my work as a designer is Internet based was not mentioned during the presentation. None the less, I hope that this was made clear by the work itself. That artists (including myself) are creating work online using commercial formats instead of criticizing them, and that my partner in crime, poet: Leonieke Rammelt is (tongue in cheek) murdering the author, are accusations that we only very briefly touched upon during the presentation, whilst the project poetryfeeder has evolved from and continues to be fueled by these very questions.

Poetryfeeder started out as an exploration of digital ‘cut up’, where I was introduced to and inspired by the production methods of the beat generation, in particular how collaboration and mutual inspiration were an important part of their literary process. From this I have discovered an interesting parallel between what Beat did to literature and from my own perspective the influence that Internet artists are having on the established and traditional art world. Rachel Greene writes that to some, “work that begins with or exists within internet or commercial formats can never rise above those limits to achieve the status of art”1.

Poetryfeeder is open, it is a process, a proposal, an intervention and most of all an invitation open to all. Naive? Perhaps. But as commercial enterprises colonize the web, and as discussions around copyright become ever more relevant, we are left with a choice, move to the outskirts, to the dark web, or infiltrate and exist within commercial formats too.

1.  Internet Art, Rachel Greene. Pg. 13

sprinkle

. . * . . * . . * . . *
.,-.♥
. . .\ ,-.
. \\ /
:Ο0∞∞∞∞••• ~♥ ~•¨¯`• ¸¸.•¨¯`•` ~
. // \
. . ./ `-’
.`-’♥
. . * . . *. . * . . *
. . . . . . . . .♥ . . . ♥ .
. * + * . . * . . * + .
+ . . * + . + * . * +
* . + *SPRINKLE.* + .
+ . . * + . + * . * + .
+ , *YOUR…. + * PAGE+ *
+ . . * + . + * . * + .*
. *…………… * + . * WITH.* .
+ . SOME. *… + * * . + * .
. * + * * + . *+ *
+ ..LOVE …..* +
+ . . * + . + * . * +
(¯`v´¯)
`*.¸.*´
¸.•´¸.•*¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.•´ .•´ ¸¸.•¨¯`• ¸¸.•¨¯`•` ~

internet

New World carpark in Hokitika, New Zealand. Photo © Cheryl Gallaway.

Decoding the Digital at the V&A

This morning I came across an interesting discussion with Hannah Redlera, this was part of a write up of the Decoding the Digital exhibition, currently on at the V&A.

“Artists aren’t always co-operative when it comes to extending the longevity of an artwork, ‘they don’t necessarily want to rewrite code for new systems software’. She suggested that computer art should be collected, ‘as an animal, not an object’, meaning, constant care is needed, rather than simply wrapping it in cotton wool and storing it in an acid-free box. So, the Science Museum has instigated Team Media, a cross-departmental initiative to audit the components of each artwork so it may be ‘re-ignited’. They’ve also recognised that asking artists to write bespoke software provides better insurance against obsolescence.”

I am not against creating bespoke software, but feel wary about ‘asking artists to write bespoke software provides better insurance against obsolescence’. Starting from scratch can feel like re-inventing the wheel or doing long multiplication when you have a calculator. There is nothing wrong with owning your software, in fact opensource software feeds off this philosophy, but there is also something to be said for the experimentation with and infiltration of proprietary (off the shelf) software. I wouldn’t mind predicting that the future preservation of systems means there will be a generation of art restorers / beekeepers with a solid grasp of code. I would like to see restorers that understand the fluidity, physics and politics of digital systems that are created using bespoke and off the shelf technology. Is asking an artist to create bespoke work that can survive the test of time, not just the introduction of another standard? Artists that want their work to survive should take heed. If we treat digital work as a painting, that can be lovingly restored to as it once was, yes perhaps setting standards will help manage the preservation. Consider this though, not all work is created to be permanent, to have a fixed appearance. Digital artworks also have a right to breath, be temporary and deteriorate.

www.vam.ac.uk/microsites/decode

The future from now… on the internet

At the second in a series of the Solar Lectures, guest speaker Steven Pemberton (UK) talked about past and future developments of the world wide web. Hexaplex was lucky enough to get a personal interview with Pemberton for our project White Smoke.

White Smoke is one in a list of HTML colour names that we have been researching the history and origins of. This was a perfect opportunity to discuss these deprecated digital artifacts with the chair of the W3C Working Group, who is developing the next generation of HTML. The origin of colour names such as Peach Puff have been particularly hard to trace, so we were interested to find out who came up with the names and why they were used. Pemberton helped shine some light on the origins of these as well as get us thinking about the future of web colours. We hope to publish this next month!

I also bumped into RR, not knowing this was the artist whose work I have been following online for sometime, I was initially attracted by the HTML ‘Mint Cream‘ trousers he was wearing. The Amsterdam artist is making work on and offline. I think he has a new(ish) online space showing work.
www.newrafael.com

Start Transition

‘log marks the transition from one design culture to the another. In the coming six months I will move my art and design practice from the Netherlands to the UK. I am about to embark on a journey where these two worlds will meet and overlap.

Today I traveled to Den Bosch and Den Haag to see the work of two dutch artists. Both of which are connected to my design practice. Photographer Krista van der Niet and artist Han Sterrenburg. The photographs exhibited by Krista were well worth going to see. With images from the exhibition online sometimes it is just too easy to stop there. Seeing the photography printed and at close proximity is quite a different experience. They have a re-assuring humour which I have seen before in Kristas work, a bold aesthetic, beautifully framed so that they feel like objects. The work can be appreciated on two levels, as a photograph, but also as spacial creations that Krista constructs for the still life and portrait. The work of Hans is the first in a series of exhibitions that will be presented at the Ten Bosch Initiative art project space. This was a chance to see the new project space, but also the minimal typographic design from Ten Bosch Initiative transpose from web to paper and wall.  Egalitarian and consistent, the identity very quickly acquires a timeless and accessible personality.

Image Krista van der Niet

Image Krista van der Niet

Image Han Sterrenburg

Cultural Creatives

A visit to the London Design Festival '09 and participating in the Dutch Design Week '09 got me thinking again about how these different cultures might shape design and the design process.

Cultural Creatives
After 8 years developing as a designer in The Netherlands, next year I will return to the UK and continue my practice. When I arrived in The Netherlands, I was taken aback by the many cultural differences between the Brits and the Dutch. I had to work hard and adapt quickly. I was motivated to learn a foreign language and this helped me tap into the Dutch ways of thinking and seeing.

With a move back across the channel on the horizon I am reaching out once again to learn more about a design culture, this time my own, British. For this move I am preparing myself for what could be another design culture shock.  Exploring the two design cultures and talking to other designers, here and there, seemed like a good place to start this exploration. Last month whilst visiting the London Design Festival and this week in Eindhoven at Dutch Design Week I have been asking a number of participants and visitors what their experiences of  British/Dutch design cultures are?

To paraphrase British Design Journalist Liz Farrely  ‘Clients tend to know what they want, and the designer is functional in producing that.’ The designer does what the client wants. The English know their place. The Dutch on the other hand don’t like to be told what to do. They use the Polder Model, which is a consensus decision-making model, where everyone has a chance to voice his or her opinion, including the designer.

Dutch designer – and writer for the column: Daily 500, has given me some interesting food for thought during this week. We met over dinner and quickly discovered a shared dislike for a typically Dutch expression: ‘Doe maar gewoon en dan doe je al gek genoeg’ which roughly translates to ‘be normal and you are wild enough’. What this expression makes apparent is how there is a lean towards moderation and conformity within Dutch culture. As much as we dislike this cultural trait, it has an upside. A designer only needs to do something slightly strange to stand out from the rest. It seems that doing just a little more (in moderation of course) than conforming has its rewards.

I don’t believe that by just being in Holland, your creativity will be stifled, I do believe it can if you let it. I can also hear the cries ‘you Brits are the ones who are repressed! Just look at your class system and hierarchies!’ I cannot disagree with this, we are repressed. What is interesting is that British designers can also turn what could be a disadvantage into an advantage. When speaking to Welsh designer Alex Rich (Field Trip), he told me that ‘struggle is a big part of the British design process, the British like to struggle and moreover it produces good work.’ Hearing this took me back to my student days at Central St Martins in London, where the competition was fierce and life as a design student ‘a struggle’.

In comparison to this The Netherlands has been a very comfortable haven to develop as a designer, with ample time for discussion and experimentation with peers as well as with clients. From the outside, it may seem that in the UK there is a more noble fight being fought. Where the monster ‘Hierarchy’ is very visible and designers can conquer  the roles ‘Junior, Mid-weight and Senior’ to become superheroes. A status which exists to justify the hard climb and encourage others to do the same.

An invisible but no less noble fight is raging in the Netherlands, where conformity is not only suffocating but can also offer comfort in times of creative doubt. The British battle has both sides clearly defined, whereas the battle for the Dutch is somewhat harder to see. Either way working on both sides of the North Sea presents it’s own challenges and when you know your fight, it can be a lot of fun.